A Comparative Study of Sodium Sulfide and Sodium Hydroxide for Keratin Extraction from Waste Chicken Feathers Based on Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Authors

  • Dalal M. Ibrahim Chemistry Department, Science Faculty, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Libya
  • Khadija H. Mohammed Libyan Academy for postgraduate Studies, AL Gabal Alkhder branch, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37375/9t5jaj98

Keywords:

Separation Keratin, Chicken Feather waste, RSM, XRD

Abstract

Keratin extraction from poultry feathers represents an environmentally sustainable approach for converting bio-waste into materials used in cosmetic and personal care applications, including shampoos, hair care formulations, skin creams, and related products. This study presents a comparative evaluation of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na2S) as extraction agents, with Response Surface Methodology (RSM) employed to optimize the operational parameters. The results demonstrated that NaOH was more effective in preserving peptide chain integrity and maintaining the structural stability of keratin, particularly under optimized conditions of 0.75 M concentration, 80 °C, and a 4 h, R² = 0.9285 extraction period. In contrast, the Na2S achieved higher extraction yields and recovered mass; however, this advantage was accompanied by an increased tendency toward partial protein degradation. Structural characterization using FT-IR and SEM analyses confirmed that keratin extracted with NaOH retained its characteristic β-sheet fibrous morphology, supporting its suitability for cosmetic and personal care applications that require high structural integrity.

References

Allaix, D., Nataraj, K., & Lakshmana, R. (2023). Response surface methodology—A statistical tool for the optimization of responses. Global Journal of Addiction & Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.19080/gjarm.2023.07.555705

Amin, S., Abbas, M., Javed, H., Asghar, Z., Ghani, N., Shaheen, S., & Yousaf, H. S. (2024). Extraction and characterization of keratin from chicken feather waste for heavy metal adsorption. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119330.

Asquith, R. S. (1977). Chemistry of natural protein fibers. Springer Science & Business Media.

Dilnozakhon, K., & Oytura, S. (2024). Laboratory extraction and physicochemical analysis of proteins from white broiler chicken feathers. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 456–470.

Gupta, A., Kamarudin, N. B., Kee, C. Y. G., & Yunus, R. B. M. (2012). Extraction of keratin protein from chicken feathers using different reducing agents. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 63(3), 115–127.

Ibrahim, D. M., Emrayed, H. F., Albarani, S. M., & Abdalrazig, B. A. (2022). Statistical study of extracted keratin protein from waste chicken feather based on response surface methodology. Scientific Journal for the Faculty of Science–Sirte University. https://doi.org/10.37375/issn.2789-858X

Kamalam, O. C., Gopal, A. B., & Manjubala, I. (2023). Extraction and characterization of keratin from chicken feather waste. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 140(12), e53652. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.53652

Kidus Tekleab, Sithole, B., & Tesfaye, T. (2020). Optimization of keratin protein extraction from waste chicken feathers using response surface methodology. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(4), 850–862.

Marliyana, S. D., Burin, G. R., de Muniz, G. I., & Alves, H. J. (2024). Efficient reducing agents for extracting β-keratin from poultry waste: A comparative study. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 15, 45–58.

Maurya, R. K., & Singh, P. (2023). Characterization of keratin extracted from waste broiler feathers for biomedical applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 242, 124350.

Mengistu, T., Erku, D., Wolka, E., Zewdie, A., & Assefa, Y. (2024). Sustainable approach for keratin hydrolysate extraction via alkaline hydrolysis: Box–Behnken design optimization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 210–225.

Parry, D. A. D., & Fraser, R. D. B. (1985). Structure and mechanics of fibrous proteins. Academic Press.

Schrooyen, P. M., Dijkstra, P. J., Oberthür, R. C., Bantjes, A., & Feijen, J. (2001). Partially carboxymethylated feather keratins: 1. Preparation in aqueous media. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 80(7), 1114–1124.

Shavandi, A., Wambua, P. M., & Githinji, D. N. (2017). Keratin extraction from catagenic wastes: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 17–35.

Sinkiewicz, I., Śliwińska, A., Staroszczyk, H., & Kołodziejska, I. (2022). An optimally designed experiment for the alkaline hydrolysis of feather keratin. Molecules, 27(7), 2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27072135

Tesfaye, T., Sithole, B., Ramjugernath, D., & Chunilall, V. (2017). Valourisation of chicken feathers: Characterisation of physical and chemical properties. Waste Management, 68, 626–635.

Vasconcelos, A., Freddi, G., & Cavaco-Paulo, A. (2008). Biodegradable materials based on silk fibroin and keratin. Biomacromolecules, 9(4), 1299–1305.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2026

How to Cite

A Comparative Study of Sodium Sulfide and Sodium Hydroxide for Keratin Extraction from Waste Chicken Feathers Based on Response Surface Methodology (RSM). (2026). Scientific Journal for Faculty of Science-Sirte University, 6(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.37375/9t5jaj98

Similar Articles

11-11 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.