Comparative Study of Reinforced Concrete Design of Short Columns between BS 8110 and ACI 318-11 (Codes)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37375/susj.v13i1.1372الكلمات المفتاحية:
Short Columns، Area of Steel Required، BS 8110-97، ACI 318M-11، Robotالملخص
In several countries around the world and Libya on of them the absence of a national design code, these leads structural engineers to use BS 8110, ACI 318 and quite a number of other structural design codes for the design of reinforced concrete structures. The principles and design approaches of these codes differ from one another. Also, some codes are more economical than others. This study compared BS 8110-97 and ACI 318M-11 in terms of the analysis and design of short column with particular emphasis on the area of longitudinal reinforcements required, with the aim of determining which of the two codes provides the most economic design. The super-structure of a seven-story reinforced concrete service building was modeled, analyzed and design using Auto Desk Robot Structural Analysis (2015) program taking into account dead, live and seismic loads. The percentage difference between the areas of steel required by the two codes was calculated with the ACI code as the base line. The average percentage difference for all columns was found to be about 21.5% indicating that the BS 8110 code requires less amount of reinforcement.
المراجع
. ACI Committee, American Concrete Institute, & International Organization for Standardization. (2011). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 31811) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.
. Adiyanto, M. I., Majid, T. A., & Zaini, S. S. (2008). Analysis and design of 3 story hospital structure subjected to seismic load using STAAD PRO. In proceedings of the international conference on construction and building technology, (pp.377-388). Malaysia: University Sains Malaysia.
. Ahmad A., J. (2010). Comparative studies of reinforcement concrete beam design using BS 8110 and ACI 318. Doctoral dissertation, University Malaysia Pahang.
. Ajayi, O. O., Fagbenle, R. O., Katende, J., Aasa, S. A., & Okeniyi, J. O. (2013). Wind profile characteristics and turbine performance analysis in Kano, north-western Nigeria. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 4(1), 1-15.
. Allen, A. (2002). Reinforced Concrete Design to BS 8110 Simply Explained. CRC Press.
. Alnuaimi, A. S., Patel, I. I., & Al-Mohsin, M. C. (2012) . Design results of rc members subjected to bending, shear, and torsion using ACI 318: 08 and BS 8110: 97 building codes. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 18(4), 213-224.
. American Society of Civil Engineers, (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE 7-10. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
. Ariffin, K., & Mahpal, M. (2010). Comparison of slab design between BS 8110 and Eurocode 2 by using Microsoft excel. Doctoral Dissertation, university Malaysia Pahang.
. Atiyah R. S. (2013). General comparison and evaluation of TEC-2007 and EC8 Using Sta4-Cad V12.1 in respect of cost estimation. Master’s Thesis, Near East University TRNC.
. British Cement Association, (1994). Worked examples for the design of concrete buildings. BCA Publication 43.505, British Cement Association, Crowthorne, (pp.258).
. British Standards Institution, (1997). BS8110 - 1997 Structural use of concrete, Part 1: code of practice for design and construction. British Standards Institution, London.
. Choi, K. K. (2002). Reinforced concrete structure design assistant tool for beginners. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
. Choo, B. S., & MacGinley, T. J. (2002). Reinforced concrete: design theory and examples. CRC Press.
. Dorsey, N. J. (2008). Flexural comparison of the ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD structural concrete codes. Master's Theses and Graduate Research at San Jose State University Scholar Work.
. Habibullah, A., & Wilson, E. (2005). SAP 2000 static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures. Computers and Structures Inc. Berkeley, California.
. Jamaludin, A. (2010). Comparative studies of reinforced concrete beam design using BS 8110-97 And ACI 318-05. FYP, University Malaysia Pahang.
. Jawad A. A. (2006). Strength design requirements of ACI-318M-02 Code, BS8110, and EuroCode2 for structural concrete: A comparative Study. Journal of Engineering and Development, 10(1), 22-28.
. Liew Y. H. (2009). British standard (BS 8110) and Eurocode 2 (EC2) for reinforced concrete column design. University of Technology Malaysia.
. Mac Gregor, J. C. (2012). Reinforced concrete mechanics and design, Sixth Edition. Pearson Education.
. McCormac, J. C., & Nelson, J. K. (2014). Design of reinforced concrete. ACI 318-11 Code Edition. Wiley. (pp.281).
. Nawy, E. (2005). Reinforced Concrete. Fifth edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. United States of America. (pp.714).
. Nawy, E. (2006). Prestressed concrete: A fundamental approach, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, (pp.38).
. Nilson, A. (1997). Design of concrete structures (12th Edition). McGraw-Hill, Inc.
. O’Brien, E.J. and A.S. Dixon, (1995). Reinforced and prestressed concrete design the complete process, 1st Edition. Longman Scientific and Technical, United Kingdom, (pp.492)
. Reynolds, C.E., J.C. Steedman & A.J. Threlfall, (2008). Reynolds’s Reinforced Concrete Designer’s Handbook, 11th Edition. Taylor and Francis, London, (pp401).
. Shah, H. J., & Jain, S. K. (2009). Design example of a six-story building. Department of Applied Mechanics MS University of Baroda, Vadodara.
. Shodolapo O. F. & Kenneth K. M. (2011). A comparative study of EC2 and BS8110 beam analysis and design in a reinforced concrete four story building. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1(12), 3172-3181.
. Sia, K. S. (2010). Comparative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97). university Malaysia Pahang.
. Yaosheng Y. (2009). British standard and Eurocode for slender reinforced concrete column design. Nanyang Technological University Singapore.
