CFD Modeling of Airfoil of wind turbine under different effect of operating conditions
Keywords:
airfoil, lift and Drag Coefficients, Aerodynamics, Reynolds number, Angle of AttackAbstract
Wind energy has been attracting more and more attentions due to its clean and renewable source. The aerodynamic characteristic of wind turbine airfoil directly affects the turbine efficiency. In this paper, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of the two-dimensional air flow over a wind turbine NACA 2414 airfoil at various angles of attack and operating Reynolds number are presented. Aerodynamics airfoil performance which were represented by Lift Coefficient (Cl), Drag Coefficient (Cd) and Lift-to-Drag ratio (Cl/Cd) are determined. The geometry of the airfoil is created using NACA parametric curves in COMSOL Multiphasics Design Modeler. CFD analysis is carried out using Comsol models at various angles of attack starting from -5° to 15°, and at seven various operating condition of Reynolds number (Re = 103, 5×103, 104 , 5×104, 105, 5×105, and 106 ). Pressure and velocity distributions over finite surface areas of NACA 2414 airfoil for different angles of attack and Reynolds number are presented. Aerodynamic performance coefficients are plotted against the angle of attack. Lift to Drag Ratio at various wind speeds of (u=0.001 m/s, 1 m/s, 5 m/s, 10 m/s and 15 m/s) for the airfoil graph is plotted.
The results is clearly noticed that CL/ CD is linearly increases as the value of angle of attack is increased and after a certain angle of attack it is decreased and this angle is called stalling angle. The results showed that the effect of varying Reynolds number was important on aerodynamic performance and on pressure and velocity distributions over the surface of airfoil.
References
worldwide look at Reserves and Production (2008) Oil & Gas J. 106 (48):23-24
"Navigant Research." Navigant Research World Market Update 2012 Comments. Web. 08 Nov. 2013.
A. M. Muftah "3D Fluid in an Elbow Meter-CFD Model" SUSJ Journal, Sirte University, Vol. 4, Issue 1, June 2014
A. Muftah "CFD Modeling of Elbow and Orifice Meters" SUSJ Journal, Sirte University, Vol. 7, Issue 1, June 2017, pp 15-32
K. S. Patel, S. B. Patel, U. B. Patel, and A. P. Ahuja, “CFD Analysis of an Aerofoil”, International Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 3, issue. 3, pp. 154-158, March 2014.
B.S. Baldwin, H. Lomax: “Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows”. AIAA Paper No. 78-257, 1978.
P. R. Spalart, Allmaras, S., "A One-equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Fows,"
AIAA-92-0439, 1992.
D. C. Wilcox, Turbulence Modeling for CFD. Canada: Industries, Inc., pp. 103-218, 1998.
F.R. Menter: “Two-equation eddy-viscosity transport turbulence model for engineering applications”. AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, 1994, pp. 1598-1605
B. Habtamu, and Y. Yingxua, “Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flow to Show Self Starting of Veritcal Axis Wind Turbine Using Fluent”, Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, 2011, pp. 962–970.
Shantanu S. Bhat, Raghuraman N. Govardhan, “Stall flutter of NACA0012 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers ”, Journal of Fluids and Structures 41 (2013)166–174
L. B. Li, Y. W. Ma, and L. Liu, “Numerical simulation on aerodynamics performance of wind turbine airfoil,” in Proc. World Automation Congress (WAC), 2012, pp. 1-4.
F. Villalpanda, M. Reggio, and A. Ilinca, “Assessment of turbulence model for flow simulation around a wind turbine airfoil,” Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, February 2011.
H. C. Ravi, N. Madhukeshwara, and S. Kumarappa, “Numerical investigation of flow transition for NACA-4412 airfoil using computational fluid dynamics,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, issue 7, pp. 2778- 2785, July 2013.
Lubitz WD. Impact of ambient turbulence on performance of a small wind turbine. Renewable Energy 2014: 61:69–73.
G. R. Srinivasan, J. A. Ekaterinaris, and W. J. McCroskey. Evaluation of Turbulence Models for Unsteady Flows of an Oscillating Airfoil. Computers & Fluids, 24(7):833-61, Sept. 1995
E. Saeta and P.Krogstad. Design of Airfoil for downwind wind turbine Rotor. Master of Sciences in Engineering. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. June, 2009
peigin, S.E., Epstein, B.: Robust Optimization of 2D Airfoils Driven by Full Navier-Stokes Computations. Computers &Fluids. 33, 1175-1200 (2004)
Sobieczky, H.: Parametric Airfoils and Wings. In. Fuji. K., Dulikravich, G.5.(EDS) Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics. Vol 68. Wiesbaden, Viewing (1998)
Derksen, R. W., Rogalsky, T.: Bezier-PARSEC. An optimized Airfoil parameterization for Design. Advances in Engineering Software, 41, 923-930 (2010)
Abbott, I.H., Von Doenhoff A.E. Theory of Wing Sections. Dover publications. Newyork (1959)
D. Mavriplis, J.C. Vassberg, E.N. Tinoco, M. Mani, O.P. Brodersen, B. Eisfeld, R.A. Wahls,
J.H. Morrison, T. Zickuhr, D. Levy, M. Murayama, Grid Quality and Resolution Issues from the Drag Prediction Workshop Series, J. Aircr. 46 (3) (2009) 935–950
Hand M. M., Simms D. A. Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical reportr, NREL/ TP 2500-29955, 2001.
Schepers J. G., Feigl L., Rooij R. V., Bruining A. Analysis of detailed aerodynamic field measurements using results from an aeroelastic code. Wind Energy, Vol. 7, Issue 4, 2004, p. 357-372
Lindenburg C. Investigation into rotor blade aerodynamics. Report Number ECN-C-03-025, 2003.