The role of the administrative judge in implementing administrative rulings "A comparative study "

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the various features of the research problem, which is to explain the role played by the administrative judge in implementing the rulings issued by him against the administration through comparison between the Egyptian and Libyan jurists. In this study, the researcher relied on the comparative legal approach and the analytical approach, and also found The study has a set of results, the most important of which are: The administrative judge has a friendly role in urging the administration to implement the rulings issued against it through several means, whether by reminding the administration and alerting it of its legal duty towards the convict out of respect for the law and the public interest that it is responsible for towards society, or by referring the convict to him. To the administration to take the necessary measures in accordance with the provisions of the ruling to return it to the state it was in before the issuance of the decision canceled under this ruling. The study recommends the establishment of a judicial body affiliated with the Supreme Court in Egypt and Libya called the Judicial Judgments Implementation Authority, whose mission will be limited to following up on the implementation of judicial rulings only. Under a law of its own that gives it full powers to ensure the implementation of judicial rulings in general and administrative rulings in particular, in order to ensure, firstly, the implementation of judicial rulings towards the administration as quickly as possible, and secondly, we ensure that cases do not pile up before the courts, which necessarily leads to a prolongation of the period for adjudicating them and a lack of confidence in the apparatus. Judicial in general