Bridging the Skills Gap: Assessing Teacher Preparedness, Digital Literacy, and Institutional Support for AI Integration in ELT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37375/foej.v5i1.3845الكلمات المفتاحية:
Artificial Intelligence، ELT، Teacher Readiness، Digital Literacy، Institutional Support، Skills Gapالملخص
The consequences of integrating Generative AI tools like ChatGPT into English Language Teaching (ELT) for personalized learning, immediate feedback, and administrative task automation could be of great importance, and the educational field has already begun to recognize it. Integrating these tools into pedagogy should be easier than it currently is. The literature reveals that the majority of teachers using AI tools is much larger (76%) than that of teachers feeling sufficiently trained to use pedagogy that incorporates AI tools (20%). Our research attempts to bridge this gap by evaluating the degree of teacher educational preparation and digital literacy relating to the ethical and pragmatic integration of AI. Through literature, this study concludes that professional qualifications and the associated pedagogical training must evolve to minimize the negative consequences of AI to be flexible and functional. There are certain minimum institutional requirements to be met to ensure the consequences of the learning module implemented are maximally useful, clearly defined governance frameworks, digital equity, controlled data privacy, and baseline soft and hardware capabilities. An AI-enabled curriculum in ELT is what this paper advocates for, and to make it acceptable, focused training programs, policies of educational baseline equity, and AI-enabled balanced pedagogy are the minimum requirements.
المراجع
• Aktay, S., Seçkin, G., & Uzunoğlu, D. (2023). ChatGPT in education. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi (TAY J), 7(2), 378–406.
• Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model‑based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Teach Engl Technol, 23(1), 23–41.
• Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educ Technol Soc, 25(1), 28–47.
• Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Educ Inf Technol.
• Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B., & Zou, D. (2023b). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Comput Educ Artif Intell, 5, 100156. (link unavailable)
• Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping review. Comput Educ Artif Intell, 3, 100101.
• Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Res Methods Appl Linguist, 2(2), 100050.
• Mohamed, A. (2023). Exploring the potential of an AI‑based chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching: Perceptions of EFL faculty members. Educ Inf Technol.
• Ray, P. P., & Das, P. K. (2023). Charting the terrain of artificial intelligence: A multidimensional exploration of ethics, agency, and future directions. Philos Technol, 36, 40.
• Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A review of AI‑powered writing tools and their implications for academic integrity in the language classroom. J Engl Appl Linguist, 2(1), 3.
• Schmidt‑Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online J, 14(1), 105–119.
• Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. Eur J Educ, 57(4), 620–631.
• Zhai, C., & Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Comput Educ Artif Intell, 4, 100134.
• Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Educ Inf Technol.





