The Effect of Variation of the Solar Azimuth Angle on the Flux Distribution Spread over the Receiver




Azimuth angle, flux distribution, ray tracing, optical efficiency


Obviously, one of the greatest challenges facing the world today is breaking fossil fuel dependence and promoting the development of new and renewable sources of energy that can supplement and, where appropriate, replace the diminishing resources of fossil fuels. Solar energy is clearly one of the most promising prospects to these problems since it is non-pollutant, renewable, and available everywhere in the world although with varying intensity. Ray tracing is an important tool for the design of the receiver elliptical–hyperboloid concentrators (EHC). However, the information about ray tracing, and flux distribution on the receiver of the EHC determines the size of the receiver using OptisTM Ray-trace software.

The present study concerns the effect of variation of the solar azimuth angle on the flux distribution on the receiver area of the EHC is examined by moving the solar energy source along the x-y plane of the aperture major axis from 0° to 90° with an increment of 15° intervals. For each azimuth angle variation, one maximum optical efficiency is observed in those variations. The maximum optical efficiency observed for each angle decreases, as the solar source is moved from 0°-90°. Results presented also show the distribution of the concentrated radiant energy over the receiver/absorber.


Armstrong S, Hurley WG. A new methodology to optimize solar energy extraction under cloudy conditions. Renew Energy 2010; 35:780–7.

Cludius J, Hermann H, Matthes FC, et al. The merit order effect of wind and photovoltaic electricity generation in Germany 2008–2016: estimation and distributional implications. Energy Econ 2014; 44:302–13.

Stanciu C, Stanciu D. Optimum tilt angle for flat plate collectors all over the world: a declination dependence formula and comparisons of three solar radiation models. Energy Convers Manage 2014; 81:133–43.

Rawat R, Kaushik SC, Lamba R. A review on modeling, design methodology and size optimization of photovoltaic based water pumping, standalone and grid connected system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 57:1506–19.

Smith CJ, Forster PM, Crook R. An all-sky radiative transfer method to predict optimal tilt and azimuth angle of a solar collector. Sol Energy 2016; 123:88–101.

Dhimish M, Holmes V, Mather P, et al. Preliminary assessment of the solar resource in the United Kingdom. Clean Energy 2018; 2:112–25.

Stanciu D, Stanciu C, Paraschiv I. Mathematical links between optimum solar collector tilts in isotropic sky for intercepting maximum solar irradiance. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 2016; 137:58–65.

Mahmoud Dhimish, Santiago Silvestre, 2019, Estimating the impact of azimuth-angle variations on photovoltaic annual energy production, Clean Energy, Vol. 3, No. 1, 47–58

Banu Poobalan, Haziah Abdul Hamid, Noor Hasnizam Hanafi and Wooi Chin Leong, 2020 The study of photovoltaic systems performance using various azimuth angles and solar array tilt positions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1432 012050

Suman Chowdhury, Md. Abul Bashar, Md. Nazmul Hossain, Anik Talukder. 2013 Temperature and Azimuth angle variation effect on the Building Integrated Photovoltaic Application in Bangladesh, IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE), Volume 8, Issue 2, PP 42-46

I.M. Saleh Ali, Tadhg S.Reddy, K. S. Mallick, Tapas K., An optical analysis of a static 3-D solar concentrator, Solar Energy, 88 (2013) 57-70.




How to Cite

M. Saleh, I., Khalifa, K., & Bughazem, M. (2023). The Effect of Variation of the Solar Azimuth Angle on the Flux Distribution Spread over the Receiver. International Journal of Engineering Research, 1(1), 56–66.