Miss .Eatidal Khalifa Hasan A Rhetorical Move Analysis and Metadiscourse of Abstracts in Graduation Projects Written by Libyan Students: A Case Study in Gharyan University
Even though abstracts are short, they require a specific type and formal structure that is accepted by academic discourse communities (San & Tan, 2012). They are governed by a discipline's own conventions i.e. a series of moves that characterize the flow of the discourse and linguistic features. This study aims to identify the rhetorical moves and metadiscourse markers that are deployed in the abstracts of projects that were written by undergraduate students in the English department at the faculty of Arts/Gharyan University. The data consisted of 30 abstracts. Hyland's models (2000; 2005) were adopted in this study. The first model (2000) was used to analyze the rhetorical moves. The second one (2005) was employed to analyze the metadiscourse. The findings revealed that most of the abstracts did not consist of the five rhetorical moves. The introduction and purpose moves were prominent, while the method, result, conclusion, and structure (new move) moves were not prominent. The absence of some of the rhetorical moves in the English abstracts of undergraduate projects might make the project abstract unable to achieve its communicative purposes and will lead to difficulty for readers to understand the content of the abstract. For metadiscourse, the findings showed that interactive metadiscourse was deployed more than interactional metadiscourse. Among these two categories, transitions, frame markers, and endophoric were used more frequently.
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Am¬sterdam: John Benjamins.
Ahmed, S. (2015). Rhetorical organization of tourism research article abstracts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 269-281.
Alotaibi, H. (2015). Metadiscourse in Arabic and English research article abstracts. World Journal of English Language, 5(2), 1-8.
Al-Shujairi, Y. B. J., Ya'u, M. S., & Buba, J. A. (2016). Role of moves, tenses, and metadiscourse in the abstract of an acceptable research article. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2 S1), 379-379.
Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. Sage Open, 9(1), 1-9.
ANSI (1979). The American standard for writing abstracts. New York: ANSI Publication.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway, (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-85) Taylor & Francis.
Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: A&C Black.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Routledge.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (Vol. 28). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher-level metatext in Ph. D theses. English for specific purposes, 18, 41-56.
Crismore, A. (1983). Metadiscourse: What is it and how is it used in school and non-school social science texts. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written communication, 10(1), 39-71.
Dahl, T. (2009). The linguistic representation of rhetorical function: A study of how economists present their knowledge claims. Written Communication, 26(4), 370-391.
Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368-392.
Doro, K. (2013). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119-139.
Dos Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk, 16(4), 481-500.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Variations in the discourse patterns favoured by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. Academic listening: Research perspectives, 146-158.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge university press.
Ella, J. R. (2020). Characterizing the Move Structure of Abstracts in Undergraduate Theses. Ciencia-Heals, 1(1), 26-43.
Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic purposes, 9 (2), 128-139.
Golebiowski, Z. (2009). Prominent messages in Education and Applied Linguistic abstracts: How do authors appeal to their prospective readers?. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 753-769.
Hadi, D., Warsono, W., & Faridi, A. (2020). Metadiscourse and Rhetorical Moves in English Abstract Section of Undergraduate Students' Final Project at Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe, Tuban. English Education Journal, 10(3), 404-413.
Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in spoken and written English. Longman's, London.
Hasan, E. & Alsout, E. (2021). Rhetorical Moves and the Evaluative ‘that’ in Research Article Abstracts of Applied Linguistics Published in the Libyan Local Journals. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies. 9(2). 58-71.
Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first-year university students' timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53-68.
Howe, Y. S (1995) A Genre-Based Analysis of Car advertisements in a local Newspaper. (Master Thesis, unpublished) Singapore: University of Singapore.
Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of pragmatics, 43(11), 2795-2809.
Huckin, T (2006) Abstracting from abstracts. In: Hewings, M (ed.) Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Birmingham: Birmingham University Press, pp. 93–103.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written communication, 18(4), 549-574.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(2), 133-151.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, UK: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied linguistics, 28(2), 266-285.
Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 125-143.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written communication, 33(3), 251-274.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for specific purposes, 24(2), 123-139.
Juanda, M. R., & Kurniawan, E. (2020). A Comparison of Rhetorical Moves in Students’ Undergraduate Thesis Abstracts. In 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) (pp. 443-448). Atlantis Press.
Khedri, M., & Kritsis, K. (2018). Metadiscourse in applied linguistics and chemistry research article introductions. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 47-73.
Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An explo¬ration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15 (3), 319-331.
Kim, L. C., & Lim, J. M.-H. (2013). Metadiscourse in English and Chinese research article introductions. Discourse Studies, 15(12), 129-146.
Kopple, W. J. V. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College composition and communication, 36 (1), 82-93.
Kosasih, F. R. (2018). A genre analysis of thesis abstracts at a State University in Banten. Lingua Cultura, 12(1), 9-14.Lingua Culture, 12(1), 9-14
Kuo, C. H. (1999) The use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 18(2), 121-38.
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Contemporary Research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics (pp. 221-271). Springer, Dordrecht.
Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46, 39-54.
Lindeberg, A. C. (2004). Promotion and politeness: Conflicting scholarly rhetoric in three disciplines. Abo Akademi University Press.
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for specific purposes, 23(3), 280-302.
Male, H. (2018). A structural move analysis of abstracts in undergraduate theses: A case study at Universitas Kristen Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 284-294.
Marandi, S. (2002). Contrastive EAP rhetoric: metadiscourse in Persian vs. English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Martin, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43
Ozdemir, N. O., & Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 59-63.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10 (2), 231-250.
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156.
San, L. Y., & Tan, H. (2012). A comparative study of the rhetorical moves in abstracts of published research articles and students’ term papers in the field of computer and communication systems engineering. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(7), 40-50.
Siyaswati, S., & Rochmawati, D. (2017). Rhetorical Perspectives of Undergraduate Students’ Thesis Abstracts. Register Journal, 10(2), 157-169.
Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research Article Abstracts in Two Related Disciplines: Rhetorical Variation between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84-99.
Suryani, F. B., & Rismiyanto, R. (2019). Move analysis of the English bachelor thesis abstracts written by Indonesians. Prominent, 2(2).
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Tanko, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 42-55.
Thompson, P. (2013). Thesis and dissertation writing. The handbook of English for specific purposes. West Essex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press, USA.
Williams, J. M. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (1st ed.). Boston: Scott Foresman.