Dr. Senussi Mohamed Saad Oraf English Language teaching curriculum reform strategies: A critical review

  • Dr. Senussi Mohamed Saad Orafi
الكلمات المفتاحية: : curriculum reform, ELT, teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices, educational policy makers.

الملخص

      There is no doubt that English language has become a gateway for better communication and employment opportunities. Given the importance of English language, many countries often introduce curricula reforms of improve the status of English language teaching in their school system. However, during the implementation, these reforms often fail to achieve the goals of those who initiated and planned these curricula reforms. This failure is often attributed to the lack of understanding the key concepts related to the process of curricula reforms. In this paper, I shed light on these key issues in an attempt to facilitate the process ELT curricula reforms. This paper has implications and useful messages for educational policy makers, curriculum development processes, and teacher education programs in English language teaching in particular, and in education in general.     

المراجع

Adey, P., and Hewitt, G. (2004). The Professional Development of Teachers: Practice and Theory. London: Kluwer Academic.
Al-Bulushi, K. (2022). Omani English as foreign language teachers’ views about participatory professional development. Athens Journal of Education, 9, (1), 161-186
Alnwaiem, A., Alazem, A., and Alenzi, A. (2021). Kuwaiti instructors’ beliefs about English and their awareness of global English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 362-369.
Bangs, J., and Frost, D. (2012). Teacher Self-Efficacy, Voice and Leadership: Towards a Policy Framework for Education International. Brussels: Education International.
Basok, E. (2020). The gap between language teaching policies and classroom practices in the Turkish EFL context: The effects on teacher motivation. MEXTESOL Journal, 44, (2), 1-14.
Bolghari, A., and Hajimaghsoodi, A. (2017). Action research as a bottom-up approach to foster teacher involvement in language curriculum change. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8, (2), 362-369.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639-662.
Chen, W., and Hsieh, J. J. (2011). English language in Taiwan: An examination of its use in society and education in schools. In A. Feng (Ed.), English Language Education Across Greater China (pp. 70-94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
De Segovia, P., and Hardison, M. (2009. Implementing Educational Reform: EFL Teachers’ Perspectives. English Language Teaching Journal 63 (2), 154–162.
Freema, D. (2020). Arguing for a knowledge base in language teacher education, then (1988) and now (2018). Language Teaching Research. 24(1), 5-16.
Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. (3th ed.) London: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. (4thed.) London: Columbia Teachers Press.
Fullan, M. (2015). The New Meaning of Educational Change. (5thed,) London: Teachers College Press.
Giroux, H. (2017). Democratic Education under Siege in a Neoliberal Society. In C. Wright-Maley, and T. Davis (Eds.), Teaching for Democracy in an Age of Economic Disparity (pp. 13-24). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Gouedard, P. Pont, B. Hyhinen, S. and, Hung, P. (2020). Curriculum Reform: A Literature Review to Support Effective Implementation. OECD Publishing Paris.
Kennedy, C. (1987). Innovating for change: Teacher development and innovation. ELT Journal, 41(3), 163-170.
Kim, E. (2008). In the Midst of ELT Curricula Reform: An Activity Theory Analysis of Teachers’ and Students’ Experiences in South Korea. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
Malderez, M. and M. Wedell. 2007. Teaching Teachers: Processes and Practices. London: Continuum.
Markee, N. (1997). Managing Curricular Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morris, P. (1998). The Hong Kong School Curriculum: Development Issues and Policies. Hong Kong University Press.
Okoth, T. (2016). Challenges of implementing a top-down curriculum innovation in English language teaching: Perspectives of form III English language teachers in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice.7,(3), 169-177.
Orafi, S. 2008. Investigating Teachers’ Practices and Beliefs in Relation to Curriculum Innovation in ELT in Libya. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. School of Education, University of Leeds.
Orafi, S, and Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System 37 (2), 243-253.
Poedjiastutie, D., Akhyar, F., Hidayatie, D., and Gasmi, F. (2018). Does curriculum help students to develop their English competence? A case study in Indonesia. Arab Journal 9(2), 175-185.
Rahman, M., Islam, M., and Ahmed, T. (2019). English language teaching in Bangladesh today: Issues, outcomes and implications. Language Testing in Asia. 9(1), 1-14.
Richardson, V., and Placier, P. (2001). Teacher Change. In V. Richardosn (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. (pp. 904-947). Washington, D C: RERA.
Rixon, S. (2013). British Council Survey of Policy and Practice in Primary English Language Teaching Worldwide. London: British Council.
Saavedra, A. and J. Steele (2012), “Implementation of the Common Core State Standards: Recommendations for the Department of Defense Education Activity Schools”.
Schwartz, A. (2002). National Standards and the Diffusion of Innovation: Language Teaching in the United States. In S. Savignon (Ed.), Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching (pp. 112-130). London: Yale University Press.
Shah, F. H. (2022). The reality of change: Teachers’ perceptions about curriculum reform in Pakistan. In Ali, N. and Coombe, C. (eds) English Language Teaching in Pakistan. (pp. 4-11) Springer, Singapore.
Stoll, L. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258.
Van den Akker, J. (2010), Curriculum Design Research, SLO: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Viennet, R. and B. Pont (2017). Education Policy Implementation: A literature Review and Proposed Framework, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 162, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Wedell, M. (2022). Innovations in ELT revisited. ELT Journal, 76 (2), 272-275.
Wedell, M., and Grassick, L. (2018). International perspectives on Teachers Living with Curriculum Change. London: Macmillan.
Wise, A. (1977). Why educational policies often fail: The hyperrationalisation hypothesis. Journal of Curriculum Studies 9 (1), 43-57.
Yano, Y. (2001). World Englishes in 2000 and Beyond. World Englishes, 20(2), 119-132.
منشور
2022-08-31
القسم
المقالات